2025 The SecOps Group Trustable Latest CNSP Exam Pdf

CNSP certifications are one of the most popular certifications currently. Earning CNSP certification credentials is easy, in first attempt, with the help of products. Real4exams is well-reputed brand among the professional. That provides the best preparation materials for CNSP Certification exams. Real4exams has a team of CNSP subject experts to develop the best products for CNSP certification exam preparation.

The best way for candidates to know our CNSP training dumps is downloading our free demo. We provide free PDF demo for each exam. This free demo is a small part of the official complete The SecOps Group CNSP training dumps. The free demo can show you the quality of our exam materials. You can download any time before purchasing. You can tell if our products and service have advantage over others. I believe our The SecOps Group CNSP training dumps will be the highest value with competitive price comparing other providers.

>> Latest CNSP Exam Pdf <<

Professional Latest CNSP Exam Pdf & Trusted CNSP Exam Braindumps & New CNSP Dump File

If you have registered The SecOps Group CNSP test, you can enter our Real4exams The SecOps Group CNSP. You may try our Real4exams The SecOps Group CNSP free demo to decide whether to buy or not. You can also download pdf real questions and answers. Real4exams The SecOps Group CNSP certification training must help you to pass the exam easily. Its practice test is the most effective. We promise to help you to get the certification. Without the certification, we will give you FULL REFUND of your purchase fees. On request we can provide you with another exam of your choice absolutely free of cost.

The SecOps Group Certified Network Security Practitioner Sample Questions (Q49-Q54):

NEW QUESTION # 49
Which Kerberos ticket is required to generate a Silver Ticket?

A. There is no specific ticket required for generating a Silver Ticket
B. Ticket-Granting Ticket
C. Service Account Ticket
D. Session Ticket

Answer: C

Explanation:
A Silver Ticket is a forged Kerberos Service Ticket (TGS - Ticket Granting Service) in Active Directory, granting access to a specific service (e.g., MSSQL, CIFS) without KDC interaction. Unlike a Golden Ticket (TGT forgery), it requires:
Service Account's NTLM Hash: The target service's account (e.g., MSSQLSvc) hash, not a ticket.
Forgery: Tools like Mimikatz craft the TGS (e.g., kerberos::golden /service:<spn> /user:<user> /ntlm:<hash>).
Kerberos Flow (RFC 4120):
TGT (Ticket-Granting Ticket): Obtained via AS (Authentication Service) with user creds.
TGS: Requested from TGS (Ticket Granting Service) using TGT for service access.
Silver Ticket Process:
No TGT needed; the attacker mimics the TGS step using the service account's stolen hash (e.g., from a compromised host).
C . Service Account Ticket: Misnomer-it's the hash of the service account (e.g., MSSQLSvc) that enables forgery, not a pre-existing ticket. CNSP's phrasing likely tests this nuance.
Security Implications: Silver Tickets are stealthier than Golden Tickets (service-specific, shorter-lived). CNSP likely stresses hash protection (e.g., LAPS) and Kerberos monitoring.
Why other options are incorrect:
A . Session Ticket: Not a Kerberos term; confuses session keys.
B . TGT: Used for Golden Tickets, not Silver.
D: Incorrect; the service account's hash (implied by "ticket") is essential.
Real-World Context: Silver Tickets exploited in APT29 attacks (2020 SolarWinds) for lateral movement.

NEW QUESTION # 50
On a Microsoft Windows operating system, what does the following command do?
net localgroup Sales Sales_domain /add

A. Add a new user to the local group Sales
B. Add a local group Sales to the domain group
C. Display the list of the users of a local group Sales
D. Add a domain group to the local group Sales

Answer: D

Explanation:
The net localgroup command manages local group memberships on Windows systems, with syntax dictating its action.
Why B is correct: net localgroup Sales Sales_domain /add adds the domain group Sales_domain to the local group Sales, granting its members local group privileges. CNSP covers this for privilege escalation testing.
Why other options are incorrect:
A: Displaying users requires net localgroup Sales without /add.
C: Adding a user requires a username, not a group name like Sales_domain.
D: The reverse (local to domain) uses net group, not net localgroup.

NEW QUESTION # 51
You are performing a security audit on a company's infrastructure and have discovered that the domain name system (DNS) server is vulnerable to a DNS cache poisoning attack. What is the primary security risk?

A. The primary risk is that an attacker could redirect traffic to a malicious website and steal sensitive information.
B. The primary risk is that an attacker could manipulate the cache of the web server or proxy server to return incorrect content for a specific URL or web page.

Answer: A

Explanation:
DNS cache poisoning, also known as DNS spoofing, involves an attacker injecting false DNS records into a resolver's cache, altering how domain names resolve.
Why A is correct: The primary risk is that an attacker can redirect users to malicious websites (e.g., phishing or malware sites) by poisoning the DNS cache with fake IP addresses. This can lead to credential theft, data exfiltration, or malware distribution. CNSP identifies this as the core threat of DNS cache poisoning, aligning with real-world attack vectors.
Why other option is incorrect:
B . Manipulate the cache of the web server or proxy server: This describes web cache poisoning, a different attack targeting HTTP caches, not DNS servers. DNS cache poisoning affects DNS resolution, not web or proxy server caches directly.

NEW QUESTION # 52
How would you establish a null session to a Windows host from a Windows command prompt?

A. net use hostnamec$ "" /u:NULL
B. net use hostnameipc$ "" /u:""
C. net use hostnamec$ "" /u:""
D. net use hostnameipc$ "" /u:NULL

Answer: B

Explanation:
A null session in Windows is an unauthenticated connection to certain administrative shares, historically used for system enumeration. The net use command connects to a share, and the IPC$ (Inter-Process Communication) share is the standard target for null sessions, allowing access without credentials when configured to permit it.
Why C is correct: The command net use hostnameipc$ "" /u:"" specifies the IPC$ share and uses empty strings for the password (first "") and username (/u:""), establishing a null session. This syntax is correct for older Windows systems (e.g., XP or 2003) where null sessions were more permissive, a topic covered in CNSP for legacy system vulnerabilities.
Why other options are incorrect:
A: Targets the c$ share (not typically used for null sessions) and uses /u:NULL, which is invalid syntax; the username must be an empty string ("").
B: Targets c$ instead of ipc$, making it incorrect for null session establishment.
D: Uses ipc$ correctly but specifies /u:NULL, which is not the proper way to denote an empty username.

NEW QUESTION # 53
Which of the aforementioned SSL/TLS protocols are considered to be unsafe?

A. Both A and B
B. SSLv2, SSLv3, TLSv1.0, TLSv1.1, TLSv1.2, and TLSv1.3
C. TLSv1.0 and TLSv1.1
D. SSLv2 and SSLv3

Answer: A

Explanation:
SSL/TLS protocols secure network communication, but older versions have vulnerabilities:
SSLv2 (1995): Weak ciphers, no handshake integrity (e.g., MITM via DROWN attack, CVE-2016-0800). Deprecated by RFC 6176 (2011).
SSLv3 (1996): Vulnerable to POODLE (CVE-2014-3566), weak block ciphers (e.g., RC4). Deprecated by RFC 7568 (2015).
TLSv1.0 (1999, RFC 2246): Inherits SSLv3 flaws (e.g., BEAST, CVE-2011-3389), weak CBC ciphers. Deprecated by PCI DSS (2018) and RFC 8996 (2021).
TLSv1.1 (2006, RFC 4346): Improved over 1.0 but lacks modern cipher suites (e.g., AEAD). Deprecated with 1.0 by RFC 8996.
TLSv1.2 (2008, RFC 5246): Secure with strong ciphers (e.g., AES-GCM), widely used today.
TLSv1.3 (2018, RFC 8446): Latest, removes legacy weaknesses, mandatory forward secrecy.
Why other options are incorrect:
A: Correct but incomplete without B.
B: Correct but incomplete without A.
D: Incorrectly includes TLSv1.2 and 1.3, which are secure and recommended.
Real-World Context: POODLE forced mass SSLv3 disablement in 2014; TLS 1.0/1.1 deprecation hit legacy systems in 2021.

NEW QUESTION # 54
......

Quality first, service second! We put much attention and resources on our products quality of CNSP real questions so that our pass rate of the CNSP training braindump is reaching as higher as 99.37%. As for service we introduce that "Pass Guaranteed". We believe one customer feel satisfied; the second customer will come soon for our CNSP Study Guide. If you want to have a look at our CNSP practice questions before your paymnet, you can just free download the demo to have a check on the web.

CNSP Exam Braindumps: https://www.real4exams.com/CNSP_braindumps.html

Why not give our The SecOps Group CNSP Exam Braindumps study materials a chance, So in order to improve the chance of being chosen whether about work condition or for self-development, especially the CNSP practice exam ahead of you right now, our company make the most effective and high quality CNSP verified questions for you, Sometimes the papers are more convenient to read and prepare CNSP tests.

Protecting Pages from Unauthenticated Visitors, How Does CI Complement CNSP Other Development Practices, Why not give our The SecOps Group study materials a chance, So in order to improve the chance of being chosen whether about work condition or for self-development, especially the CNSP Practice Exam ahead of you right now, our company make the most effective and high quality CNSP verified questions for you.

Quiz The SecOps Group - CNSP Fantastic Latest Exam Pdf

Sometimes the papers are more convenient to read and prepare CNSP tests, Just starting study with CNSP dumps torrent, you will be on the way to success.

The advantages of our CNSP guide materials are too many to count and you can free download the demos to have a check before purchase.